Quick Answer
If you were injured on someone else’s property and there was no warning sign alerting you to a hazard — a wet floor, uneven pavement, a broken step, a dangerous pool area — the property owner may be liable under California premises liability law. California Civil Code Section 1714 imposes a general duty of care on property owners to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn visitors of non-obvious hazards they knew or should have known about. The absence of a warning sign is significant evidence of breach of that duty.
Ghazal Sadeghi
Key Takeaways
- California Civil Code Section 1714 requires property owners to use ordinary care in managing their property to avoid injury to others
- Under California Civil Code Section 1714, landowners owe a duty of care to all lawful visitors — and must warn of known hazards that are not obvious
- The lack of a warning sign is evidence of breach of the duty to warn, but you must also show the owner knew or should have known about the hazard
- California uses a reasonableness standard: if a reasonable property owner would have posted a warning sign, failure to do so constitutes negligence
- The two-year statute of limitations (CCP Section 335.1) applies to premises liability injury claims; government property injuries require a six-month government tort claim under Government Code Section 911.2
California Premises Liability: The Duty to Warn
California replaced the historical distinction between invitees, licensees, and trespassers in Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, establishing a general duty of ordinary care for all property owners toward all persons on their property (with some exceptions for trespassers in certain circumstances). For lawful visitors, the property owner’s duty includes: repairing known hazards in a reasonable time; and warning visitors of known hazards that are not open and obvious.
A wet floor without a “Wet Floor” cone or sign is the classic example. If a grocery store employee mops a floor and does not post a warning sign, and a customer slips and falls, the store breached its duty to warn. Similarly, a broken step, uneven sidewalk, or missing handrail on a staircase may require a warning sign pending repair.
What You Must Prove Without a Warning Sign
Even without a sign, you must prove: (1) the owner knew or should have known about the hazard (constructive notice); (2) the hazard was not open and obvious; (3) the owner failed to take reasonable steps to warn you or repair the hazard; and (4) the hazard caused your injury and damages. Evidence of how long the hazard existed, whether prior incidents were reported, and whether employees were in the area creates constructive notice.
Government Property
If you were injured on government-owned property (sidewalk, public building, park, government parking lot), different rules apply. You must file a government tort claim within six months of the injury under California Government Code Section 911.2. Missing this deadline permanently bars your claim against the government entity.
Contact Accident Network Law Group
Attorney Damoun Yazdi handles premises liability and slip-and-fall claims throughout Southern California. His team serves Costa Mesa, Riverside, Rancho Cucamonga, Apple Valley, Victorville, and surrounding areas. Free consultations, contingency fee. Se habla espanol.

